<mods:mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Settlement of Mass Torts in a Federal System&#13;
</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Francis</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">McGovern</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Engle v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. raises the questions of whether and how elastic mass torts can be settled in our federal system.  In particular, there is a procedural and practical dilemma: state courts provide relative ease of class action certification, but with the power to provide closure.  A wide variety of options for the parties are considered in light of the Amchem and Ortiz decisions with the conclusion that the demand for finality will drive "bottom-up" reform and lead to more flexibility in resolving those types of mass torts.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2001</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Journal Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>