Home

Repository Home

Vidmar, Neil and Saks, Michael J. (2003) A Flawed Search for Bias in the American Bar Association's Ratings of Prospective Judicial Nominess: A Critique of the Lindgren Study. Journal of Law & Politics, 17 . pp. 219-255.

Abstract

Abstract not available

PDF - Go to Document. (Requires a PDF viewer such as Adobe Acrobat Reader)
1818Kb

Commentary on:	Vidmar, Neil and Saks, Michael J. (2003) Asserted But Unproven: A Further Response to the Lindgren Study's Claim That the American Bar Association's Ratings of Judicial Nominees Are Biased. Journal of Law & Politics, 19 . pp. 177-203.
Document Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	?? K1 ??
ID Code:	1023
Deposited By:	Melanie Dunshee
Deposited On:	10 Feb 2005
Last Modified:	19 Oct 2007 14:46

Commentary/Response Threads

Vidmar, Neil and Saks, Michael J. Asserted But Unproven: A Further Response to the Lindgren Study's Claim That the American Bar Association's Ratings of Judicial Nominees Are Biased. (deposited 10 Feb 2005)
- Vidmar, Neil and Saks, Michael J. A Flawed Search for Bias in the American Bar Association's Ratings of Prospective Judicial Nominess: A Critique of the Lindgren Study. (deposited 10 Feb 2005) [Currently Displayed]

Repository Staff Only: item control page